On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 05:38:41PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 07:03:27PM -0500, Steven Hazel wrote:
> > I like this scheme.  It's not broken, it's not ridiculous, it's not
> > even going to break backward compatibility.  Let's just do it this
> > way.
> 
> My concern is that two distinct types of key are emerging, KSKs, SSKs,
> CHKs, and SVKs on one side, which all require specific server-side code,
> and then MSKs, and this new keytype which are just client-side
> conveniences, rather than real keys (and are converted to one of the
> server-side key-types before a freenet node even sees them).
> 
> I am not saying that I think MSKs and other "virtual" key-types are a
> bad idea, but I do think that the destinction between server-side and
> client-side should be made in the key itself.  If not, we risk further
> confusion in the future.

Ian, m'friend, what are you talking about?  My proposal involved exactly
zero pseudo keytypes.

-- 

# tavin cole
#
# "The process of scientific discovery is, in effect,
#  a continual flight from wonder."
#                                   - Albert Einstein


_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
Devl at freenetproject.org
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
>From - Tue Apr 17 01:41:06 2001
Return-Path: <devl-admin at freenetproject.org>
Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (postfix@[4.18.42.11])
        by funky.danky.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA02478
        for <danello at danky.com>; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 07:18:39 -0400
Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id 31CEC580E1; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 04:00:08 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: devl at freenetproject.org
Received: from ruthenium (ruthenium.btinternet.com [194.73.73.138])
        by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1983558096
        for <devl at freenetproject.org>; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 03:59:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [213.122.149.98] (helo=zen)
        by ruthenium with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #83)
        id 14p6dS-0005Ux-00
        for devl at freenetproject.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 11:53:35 +0100
Received: from agl by zen with local (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian))
        id 14p6s5-0000L4-00
        for <devl at freenetproject.org>; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 12:08:41 +0100
From: Adam Langley <[email protected]>
To: devl at freenetproject.org
Message-ID: <20010416120841.B1104 at linuxpower.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0ntfKIWw70PvrIHh"

Reply via email to