Tavin Cole <tavin at mailandnews.com> writes: > SSKs are the most annoying little URIs. They have a way of making > proposed URI standards accomodate them in convoluted ways. [...] > Better?
I still like the scheme Brandon proposed yesterday. I think you're going to have to explain something that's wrong with it in order to convince me to prefer another scheme. -S _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl >From - Tue Apr 17 01:41:16 2001 Return-Path: <devl-admin at freenetproject.org> Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (postfix@[4.18.42.11]) by funky.danky.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA03776 for <danello at danky.com>; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 12:29:36 -0400 Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBB94580FB; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 09:11:05 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: devl at freenetproject.org Received: from femail2.rdc1.on.home.com (femail2.rdc1.on.home.com [24.2.9.89]) by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68BA057FF2 for <devl at freenetproject.org>; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 09:10:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gw.localdomain ([24.68.44.193]) by femail2.rdc1.on.home.com
