It seems like various people here would rather do away with KSKs. I'd like these people to address how data submission might be dealt with in lieu of public keyspace. How would in-freenet key indices work without KSKs? How would things like EOF be implemented if users aren't able to submit data under public keys bearing a particular prefix?
Is getting rid of KSKs really worth having to rely on external services for collecting data? ============================================================= = Adrian Lopez <adrian2 at caribe.net> ========================= = if (ideals != reality) return frustration; ================ ============================================================= _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl >From - Tue Apr 17 01:42:31 2001 Return-Path: <devl-admin at freenetproject.org> Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (postfix@[4.18.42.11]) by funky.danky.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA06187 for <danello at danky.com>; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 20:43:50 -0400 Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28F2258149; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 17:25:12 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: devl at freenetproject.org Received: from moe.cc.utexas.edu (moe.cc.utexas.edu [128.83.42.2]) by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CBE357FF8 for <devl at freenetproject.org>; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 17:24:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (blanu at localhost) by moe.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/cc-uts-client-1.11) with ESMTP id TAA23658 for <devl at freenetproject.org>; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 19:19:57 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: moe.cc.utexas.edu: blanu owned process doing -bs From: Brandon <[email protected]> X-Sender: blanu at moe.cc.utexas.edu To: devl at freenetproject.org Subject: RE: [freenet-devl] YAPFTUS (yet another proposal for the URI standard)
