>>>>> "AL" == Adrian Lopez <adrian2 at caribe.net> writes:
AL> It seems like various people here would rather do away with
AL> KSKs. I'd like these people to address how data submission
AL> might be dealt with in lieu of public keyspace. How would
AL> in-freenet key indices work without KSKs? How would things
AL> like EOF be implemented if users aren't able to submit data
AL> under public keys bearing a particular prefix?
I think both of them could be handled by having a
public-write-private-read key type -- kind of like an SSK in reverse.
AL> Is getting rid of KSKs really worth having to rely on external
AL> services for collecting data?
I'd definitely say NOT until we've got some other mechanism in place.
~Mr. Bad
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Mr. Bad <mr.bad at pigdog.org> | Pigdog Journal | http://pigdog.org/
freenet:MSK at SSK@u1AntQcZ81Y4c2tJKd1M87cZvPoQAge/pigdog+journal//
"Statements like this give the impression that this article was
written by a madman in a drug induced rage" -- Ben Franklin
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
Devl at freenetproject.org
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
>From - Tue Apr 17 01:42:36 2001
Return-Path: <devl-admin at freenetproject.org>
Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (postfix@[4.18.42.11])
by funky.danky.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA06233
for <danello at danky.com>; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 20:51:00 -0400
Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
