>>>>> "PT" == Peter Todd <pete at petertodd.ca> writes:
PT> On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 08:25:18PM +0000, Adrian Lopez wrote:
>> It seems like various people here would rather do away with
>> KSKs. I'd like these people to address how data submission
>> might be dealt with in lieu of public keyspace. How would
>> in-freenet key indices work without KSKs? How would things like
>> EOF be implemented if users aren't able to submit data under
>> public keys bearing a particular prefix?
PT> You would give out the private key of a SSK for submissions.
Well, that wouldn't really help, actually, if you think about it,
right? You could still do an HTL=1 attack on a well-known private key.
~Mr. Bad
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Mr. Bad <mr.bad at pigdog.org> | Pigdog Journal | http://pigdog.org/
freenet:MSK at SSK@u1AntQcZ81Y4c2tJKd1M87cZvPoQAge/pigdog+journal//
"Statements like this give the impression that this article was
written by a madman in a drug induced rage" -- Ben Franklin
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
Devl at freenetproject.org
