On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 09:04:41PM +0200, Stefan Reich wrote: > From: "Ray Heasman" <nurf at wuzzle.org> > > The solution is to limit the percentage of the datastore that can be > > affected by reads, as explained further in my reply to Ian on the "Another > > possible bug" thread. Essentially you have two datastores, one for > caching. > > Ok, I see. > > With your scheme, I see a problem with anonymity of inserts though. If > something is inserted with HTL n, it will end up in the non-caching part of > exactly n datastores, right?
I don't know. I'll have to scratch my head for a bit and consult documentation. > > This makes it a lot easier to find out who the original inserter was. If you > can see inside one node that received the file during insertion, it is > probably possible to find out all or most of the other nodes involved. Um. I'm not sure I agree. You change where data goes in tha cache, that's all. How, exactly? > > I can't get anyone to comment on this proposal though. :-( > > I just did ;-) And it is greatly appreciated. :-) Cya, Ray _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
