>From Ray Heasman <nurf at wuzzle.org> >The solution is to limit the percentage of the datastore that can be >affected by reads, as explained further in my reply to Ian on the "Another >possible bug" thread. Essentially you have two datastores, one for caching. > >I can't get anyone to comment on this proposal though. :-( > >Oh well. > >Cya, >Ray
The big problem I see with the 'two datastores' system (besides deciding what % to devote to inserts vs. requests) is that it assumes that the key is routed correctly when it is inserted, and that this location remains stable... I don't think we can rely on either of these to be true. -- Benjamin Coates _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
