On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 03:37:29PM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 11:04:44AM -0800, Scott G. Miller wrote:
> > I'm going to have to agree here. A 0.5 release is premature and at worst
> > lying about the readiness of the code.
>
> Nobody is lying about anything, that is crazy-talk. The current
> benchmark for a stable Freenet release is 0.3.9.2, and as soon as the
> 0.4 tree exceeds this in-terms of stability, we owe it to our users to
> make the most stable version the actual stable version, and this means
> releasing 0.5. People may argue that fixing the datastore bug might not
> bring 0.4 up to 0.3 stability, personally I am optimistic, but
> either-way we will be able to see before we make the decision.
Yes, and the way we find this out is by releasing the next in the 0.4
series, followed by a short period of intense testing. Personally I'm not
all that confident that fixing the datastore will give us this stability,
what with the reports of runaway nodes.
Scott
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20011111/597b8e60/attachment.pgp>
