On Tue, 09 Oct 2001, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 05:33:17PM -0500, thelema wrote: > > On Mon, 08 Oct 2001, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 09:05:09AM -0500, thelema wrote: > > > > > > Well, it seems to me that the best way to check if the node can connect > > > to a reference is to have the node attempt to connect to it. In practice > > > it may seem that just making the connection from the same machine covers > > > all the bases, but I don't like depending on the abribrary > > > characteristics of current networking protocols - it's better to do > > > stuff in a manner that is axiomatically certain. > > > > > I'd rather have the operation of the node-tester not impaired by the > > (lack of) operation of a currently running node, thank you. > > That is just silly. If the node doesn't work, what is the point of > trying to run it in the first place? > I wish I knew why the node stops working after a while. I still run it though for that period of time where it does (more or less) work.
Thelema -- E-mail: thelema314 at bigfoot.com If you love something, set it free. GPG 1536g/B9C5D1F7 fpr:075A A3F7 F70B 1397 345D A67E 70AA 820B A806 F95D -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20011008/f19aef76/attachment.pgp>
