On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 11:07:23AM +0100, toad wrote: > On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 11:07:51AM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote: < > > > I don't believe there has been any significant questioning of redundant > > splitting since more than a year ago. The hit against network > > performance because there is more data cannot compare with the > > exponential numbers if you split without redundancy - and if Freenet is > > bordering on holding more data than it can carry it is in trouble > > anyways. The second is true, which is why we need clients to behave well > > and request different patterns randomly. > > But what clients will do, most likely, is request all pieces and use whatever > comes first, improving latency.
Which for all intents and purposes is fine. The real problem is if all clients only requested the first parts by default. > > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > Devl at freenetproject.org > http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl -- Though here at journey's end I lie In darkness buried deep, above all shadows rides the Sun beyond all towers strong and high, and the Stars forever dwell: beyond all mountains steep, I will not say the Day is done, nor bid the Stars farewell. (JRRT) Oskar Sandberg oskar at freenetproject.org _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
