On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 12:52:49AM +0000, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > Don't be a total idiot. You don't need to draw each block individually, > Simon's initial graphic did have blocks drawn individually, or at least > colors reused.
Nice climb-down Matthew, I almost didn't notice you admitting that you were wrong. Almost. > > rather you split the bar up into several components (4 in my proposal > > IIRC), each representing the number of blocks in each of the 4 states I > > outlined. > More than four. > 1. Not tried yet. > 2. Trying. > 3. Failed, retrying. > 4. Got. > 5. Failed repeatedly, given up on this one. As I have repeatedly stated, (3) is unnecessary, those blocks can just be left as (2) (you are still "trying" them after-all). > If you can't see what's wrong with using javascript to implement the UI, > then it's not worth my time to try to explain it to you. Christ Matthew - what has got into you today?! You are being a complete arrogant condescending asshole - and what makes it so funny is that you keep losing your arguments! My suggestion was to take advantage of Javascript if it is available, but to get-by without it if it isn't. If you can't tell me what is wrong with this then you are obviously wrong and you know it, but you are childishly trying to disguise that fact with arrogance and condescension. It won't work. Ian. -- Ian Clarke ian@[freenetproject.org|locut.us|cematics.com] Latest Project http://cematics.com/kanzi Personal Homepage http://locut.us/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021219/2ac2d964/attachment.pgp>
