On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 02:13:49AM +0000, Matthew Toseland wrote: > But one of the advantages of the smaller interface is that it's smaller. > Not just that it's idiot-proof. Hence the desire to have small-simple, > small-detailed, and large-detailed (large-simple is pointless, maybe we > should have large-very-detailed though :)).
I don't deny that having three interfaces would offer the user more choice, but sometimes it can look silly if you go overboard on the choice thing - and I feel that three interfaces to the same information *is* definitely going overboard, and may even confuse the user. If the whole of Freenet revolved on a user's ability to examine the details of splitfile downloads then it might be appropriate, but it doesn't and it isn't. Ian. -- Ian Clarke ian@[freenetproject.org|locut.us|cematics.com] Latest Project http://cematics.com/kanzi Personal Homepage http://locut.us/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021219/dcd1b54d/attachment.pgp>
