On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 03:38:48PM +0100, marcoc1 at dada.it wrote: > >If you can explain, specifically, why this is bad, then we won't do it. > > Just to be coherent; we roughtly say "Active contents are Evil" > to Joe users that don't care so much, so I think it is > better not to use it in the Freenet interface.
Urm, we say "Active content is evil when downloaded from Freenet". Please explain, specifically, the bad thing that will happen if we use Javascript in the manner I describe. If you can explain what this bad thing is, then we won't use Javascript. Vague "Javascript is evil" responses don't count. Ian. -- Ian Clarke ian@[freenetproject.org|locut.us|cematics.com] Latest Project http://cematics.com/kanzi Personal Homepage http://locut.us/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021220/e925d844/attachment.pgp>
