On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 08:45:42PM +0000, Matthew Toseland wrote: > After we have a good filter, we will be allowing limited scripting... > certainly after that point it makes sense for the UI to use javascript. > Before that it's a bit hypocritical, but I don't feel strongly about it > (now). Implementing such a filter is probably 0.5.3 or so.
For the last time, it only appears hypocritical if you don't understand the Javascript issue. We are making the argument that running Javascript from untrusted unaccountable and anonymous sources on Freenet is a bad idea - however in this case, we are the source of the Javascript, and are trusted, accountable, and we obviously aren't anonymous. Ian. -- Ian Clarke ian@[freenetproject.org|locut.us|cematics.com] Latest Project http://cematics.com/kanzi Personal Homepage http://locut.us/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021221/99e0e7b1/attachment.pgp>
