In message <20021220145209.GA28385 at freenetproject.org>, Ian Clarke <ian at freenetproject.org> writes >On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 03:38:48PM +0100, marcoc1 at dada.it wrote: >> >If you can explain, specifically, why this is bad, then we won't do it. >> >> Just to be coherent; we roughtly say "Active contents are Evil" >> to Joe users that don't care so much, so I think it is >> better not to use it in the Freenet interface. > >Urm, we say "Active content is evil when downloaded from Freenet". > >Please explain, specifically, the bad thing that will happen if we use >Javascript in the manner I describe. If you can explain what this bad >thing is, then we won't use Javascript. Vague "Javascript is evil" >responses don't count. > >Ian. > People will think it is alright to enable javascript because Mr. Clarke says so. This is a Bad Thing. -- Roger Hayter
_______________________________________________ devl mailing list devl at freenetproject.org http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
