On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 05:42:03AM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 12:37:17PM +0000, Roger Hayter wrote: > > The last thing we want is > > the multiple warnings and tendency to stall inherent in using javascript > > tested with IE when it is used elsewhere, which applies the more so when > > javascript is disabled. > > The only Javascript functionality we are considering using is to make a > window pop-up which is roughly the same appearance and dimensions as a > normal download window. This is a very basic usage of Javascript which > has been supported by all browsers for donkeys-years. If a browser > doesn't support JS, or if JS has been disabled, then it will work just > fine, except that the download window will appear in the browser rather > than in a separate Window. > > If you can explain, specifically, why this is bad, then we won't do it. At what point are we making the window? It would seem to me that we will have to do this on the freenet page with the link to the file, which means accepting a specific javascript in freesites... > > Ian. > > -- > Ian Clarke ian@[freenetproject.org|locut.us|cematics.com] > Latest Project http://cematics.com/kanzi > Personal Homepage http://locut.us/
-- Matthew Toseland toad at amphibian.dyndns.org amphibian at users.sourceforge.net Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker. Employed full time by Freenet Project Inc. from 11/9/02 to 11/1/03 http://freenetproject.org/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021220/59921cf4/attachment.pgp>
