On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 04:48:17PM +0100, Goran Thyni wrote: > JDK 1.4 is stricter in syntax, > f.ex. there is some problems inheriting from > inner/nested public classes and interfaces which > appears in the current freenet code. > > GCJ also has troubles with these and it seems to > be related in a too relaxed syntax in easrier versions > of JDK. > > I would like to break the classes/interfaces into > seperate files to make it compile with J2DK 1.4 and > GCJ 3.x without breaking the compilation with earlier > versions of jikes/jdk of course. > > Is this OK todo?
You're proposing moving all inner classes into separate files? That sounds like an infeasible and probably unjustifiable nightmare. We don't need to be concerned with GCJ. They are still very buggy and obviously still getting their act together. When GCJ more or less works we'll start worrying about how to accomodate it. What are the specific problems with JDK 1.4? We will do what we can to conform to its syntactic requirements. -tc -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 240 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020216/96e377cf/attachment.pgp>
