On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 05:07:34PM -0500, Tavin Cole wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 10:03:48PM +0100, Goran Thyni wrote:
> > Could this be a lead?
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/2002-02/msg00075.html
> 
> Goran,
> 
> It sounds like the cure for this is to replace:
> 
> import BinaryTree.Node;
> 
> with:
> 
> import freenet.support.BinaryTree.Node;
> 
> In other words, give a full package name to make the import statement
> legal.  Hope that helps.

Yes,
I tried myself, and it worked OK 
so the patch is applied to CVS.

GCJ still has problems with finding
complicated nesting like in
package freenet.fs.acct.sys.AccountingTreeBlock

* across pacakges
* more than one level of inheritance of nested classes/interfaces

it is not even simple to bug report,
I must build a test case isolating to problem.

regards,
--
G?ran




_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
Devl at freenetproject.org
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to