On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 11:58:56PM +0000, ben at cbfmail.com wrote: > >Please try upgrading to 533. Does that fix the problem? > > No more processor eating as far as I can see ;) > > Has someone played with the bandwidth controls? Not only do they seem > to be working, but they work without making my node load 100%. Infact my > node load is 30% at the moment while doing loads, so looking good. > > am using 240 threads, works much better for me with more threads (?), > and also rtmaxnodes and rtmaxrefs on 100 not 50 as that helped in a > previous build, and it all seems lovely... for now :P > > which is more efficient: limiting upstream and downstream separately, > or just sticking in a combined maximum in Overall?
Limit them separately, as you probably have an asymmetric, full duplex connection... if your connection is asynchronous and half-duplex, as somebody once said ADSL was, the limits need to be set a bit low, especially the slower one, since the slow uplink steals tons of bandwidth from the fast downlink... > > ty > > Powered by CBFMail http://www.cbfmail.com -- Matthew Toseland toad at amphibian.dyndns.org amphibian at users.sourceforge.net Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker. Employed full time by Freenet Project Inc. from 11/9/02 to 11/11/02. http://freenetproject.org/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021107/9264aca0/attachment.pgp>
