> i know you will be *shocked* to hear me say this, but I think that's > kind of silly. it seems pretty obvious to me that nothing is going to > be changed.
Firstly, at what point did I say that not doing anything was not an option? Secondly, making a request to freesite authors is hardly "not doing anything". > as cofe has made it abundantly clear, he's gone over all > arguments about linking child porn and arrived at his personal opinion > to keep things the way they are right now... Not necessarily, if you look at today's CofE he is clearly considering alternatives. > so why did you bring this up if only to leave things unchanged? To find out what people's opinions were - why else? Ian. -- Ian Clarke ian at locut.us Coordinator, The Freenet Project http://freenetproject.org/ Founder, Locutus http://locut.us/ Personal Homepage http://locut.us/ian/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20030501/e0c5bfcf/attachment.pgp>
