I've used both and think they're about equally important, last I checked frost was hardly being developed tho.
On Nov 19, 2005, at 04:39, Ian Clarke wrote: > Unfortunately Frost's userbase isn't very well represented on these > lists from what I have seen. Someone should ask this on a Frost > board. > > Ian. > > On 18 Nov 2005, at 15:27, Ed Tomlinson wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> In my case Fproxy is more important. I never found frost that >> effective. >> >> Ed >> >> On Friday 18 November 2005 16:36, Matthew Toseland wrote: >>> Which of these is more important? >>> - SSKs -> minimal FCPv2 -> working frost boards, and maybe working >>> frost >>> filesharing too. (splitfiles work right now) >>> - Manifests -> SSKs -> Fproxy (with initially command line site >>> insert). >>> - Opennet support. >>> - Ability to fetch logs from nodes... >>> >>> Current issues: >>> 1. We need money. Fast. >>> One way to get this is to get some general enthusiasm amongst the >>> Freenet userbase. Another is to get some amongst the slashdot crowd. >>> Either way, we need more people on the network, and we need more >>> apps. >>> 2. We need more nodes. We need more people on the network. >>> Problems: >>> a) To debug properly, I need people to be online when their node >>> is, so they can send me their logs if I want them. Possible fix: >>> Make >>> the node automatically send me logs if I ask for it; minimal >>> testnet >>> support. Then we can have all nodes online more or less >>> permanently. >>> b) Can just ask for more testers. (Come to #freenet-alphatest on >>> irc.freenode.net if you want in!) >>> c) Opennet is a possibility, but we don't want to have opennet >>> support >>> before we have shown that the darknet can vaguely work, and >>> finished >>> with the datastore format changes. Opennet is much less tested >>> theoretically than darknet. >>> 3. We need apps. >>> a) Frost. If I implement SSKs, then a minimal FCP, then Frost should >>> just about work, once it is rewritten a bit. >>> b) Fproxy. If I implement SSKs, and manifests, then I can implement >>> Fproxy, with sites initially being inserted through the command >>> line >>> interface. >>> >>> IMHO it is not yet time for opennet support, as we haven't finished >>> playing with the datastore... >>> >>> The current testnet is very small. >> > > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > Devl at freenetproject.org > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl >
