On 10 Aug 2006, at 04:06, David Sowder (Zothar) wrote: > It seems to me that you've just re-introduced the array that was > removed in r10005, a changeset that seems to be the result of > deciding that generating raw HTML is bad for some reason and > replacing it with something more complicated, but with no clear to > me advantage.
While not familiar with the details, I assume the motivation is to separate the controller from the view. This helps because it means that a designer can modify the appearance of fproxy without editing Java code, and will also help with internationalization. Ian. Ian Clarke: Co-Founder & Chief Scientist Revver, Inc. phone: 323.871.2828 | personal blog - http://locut.us/blog -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20060810/fce17166/attachment.html>
