On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 09:27:32AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > On 10 Aug 2006, at 04:06, David Sowder (Zothar) wrote: > >It seems to me that you've just re-introduced the array that was > >removed in r10005, a changeset that seems to be the result of > >deciding that generating raw HTML is bad for some reason and > >replacing it with something more complicated, but with no clear to > >me advantage. > > While not familiar with the details, I assume the motivation is to > separate the controller from the view. This helps because it means > that a designer can modify the appearance of fproxy without editing > Java code, and will also help with internationalization.
That's CSS's job isn't it? Although I do like the changes. > > Ian. -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20060810/0c6f1a74/attachment.pgp>
