On Thursday 10 August 2006 13:06, David Sowder (Zothar) wrote:
> It seems to me that you've just re-introduced the array that was
> removed in r10005, a changeset that seems to be the result of
> deciding that generating raw HTML is bad for some reason and
> replacing it with something more complicated, but with no clear to me
> advantage.
PeerNodeStatus has nothing to do with the HTML generation. It's for
having a consistent state during page generation which should be less
confusing to the user.
David
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20060810/a3abed5c/attachment.pgp>
