On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 08:46:14PM +0100, Jano wrote: > Bob Ham wrote: > > > I think there are deeper issues to deal with. Even disregarding the > > database, fred's memory footprint is massive. For the functionality > > that it provides, it seems to me to be excessive. I can't understand > > why fred would need anything in excess of a few 10s of megabytes. Where > > is this memory going? > > I agree here. BDB seems a mature database; switching databases without > really isolating the culprit seems premature.
Bob's "deeper issues" are illusory; local configuration problems. BDB uses 54MB when I have told it to use 20MB. That is the issue here. BDB is responsible for the majority of Fred's memory usage as of now as far as I can see. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070201/0534c520/attachment.pgp>
