Jano wrote: > I'm running now with 256m to see if the differences are even more > apparent. I'll send later some graphs obtained with jconsole that pretty > much back that there's leaking going on (i.e. if we find the leak, freenet > will run comfortably with 128m or less).
Here are some graphs extracted from jconsole. Threads, heap (all), heap (only long-lived objects), and general view. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: fullheap.png Type: image/png Size: 31036 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070204/866d4dc3/attachment.png> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: general.png Type: image/png Size: 65724 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070204/866d4dc3/attachment-0001.png> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: longlivedheap.png Type: image/png Size: 14944 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070204/866d4dc3/attachment-0002.png> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: threads.png Type: image/png Size: 28935 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070204/866d4dc3/attachment-0003.png>
