Florent Daigni?re skrev: > * Zero3 <zero3 at zerosplayground.dk> [2008-12-11 19:18:30]: > >>> Disadvantages: >>> - Have to do some work on emu. >>> > > That alone is a good reason why *not* to do it. I don't see why > installers should be auto-built nor built from emu for that matter. >
Investing time is a necessary cost for doing anything new. You won't get far without investing time in something... Building the installers on emu seems like the most logical thing to me? Packaging the files the same place they are compiled seems like a good approach. >> I'd argue that most >> coders can figure out how AHK works quite easily though. There are a >> bunch of examples on the AHK site (e.g. >> http://www.autohotkey.com/docs/scripts/VolumeOSD.htm) if anyone is >> interested. >> >> > > We all have soooo much free time on our hands that we would eager learn > that new, windows-only technology. Oh, and that's also why we do have a > native windows installer since before 0.7 started too btw. > > Can't we drop the sarcastical tone for once, please? My point is merely that any maintenance should be possible for most coders. I'm not saying anyone should learn the whole language, I'm saying that small changes should be quite easy. - Zero3
