* Zero3 <zero3 at zerosplayground.dk> [2008-11-26 00:08:17]:

> Matthew Toseland skrev:
> >> An 
> >> installer that works on all three platforms has many advantages, but
> >> will never be as smooth or intuitive as platform-specific installers
> >> because people have differing expectations of each platform.  For
> >> example, Windows users tend to expect a Wizard-style installer.  Mac
> >> users expect a DMG containing an executable App that they can drag to
> >> their Applications folder.  Linux users expect to be able to use
> >> apt-get, yum, or something else depending on their specific distro.
> >>     
> >
> > Unless their specific distro happens to be unsupported. Which is common, 
> > because the distro market is still extremely fragmented. Hence we need a 
> > good 
> > GUI installer even for linux. No?
> >   
> deb and rpm probably covers most of the GUI distros. The "Alien" program can 
> convert packages to various other formats if needed.
> 

That's not proper packaging.

> >> Next, we must identify anything that can be improved in Freenet that
> >> would make writing these installers easier.
> >>     
> >
> > IMHO moving the "wizard" part into the node itself was an important step in 
> > the right direction. We could move the rest into the node by always 
> > downloading the plugins and seednodes file in the installer, and asking the 
> > user about the plugins during the post-install wizard. Ideally we'd also 
> > ask 
> > the user about auto-start in the post-install wizard (defaulting on but 
> > executing a script to turn it off if the user asks us to).
> >   
> I agree. It doesn't seem like that big of a task to move the rest of the 
> stuff into the wizard (now you already have the framework).
> 

Putting stuffs in the wizard goes against the packaging logic. On debian
you would want to use debconf to ask the user on how to configure his
node...

> I'd argue for a default autorun status of "off" though, and instead make 
> "on" the default on the relevant wizard page, along with a short 
> description of advantages/consequences of autorun'ing Freenet.

Here you are just being silly... but let's address that on the other
thread:
http://archives.freenetproject.org/message/20081126.001810.5c2fe629.en.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20081126/bf3e1e03/attachment.pgp>

Reply via email to