Matthew Toseland skrev: >> IPv6 will >> probably solve most of the NAT and IP issues with time. >> > > No, first IPv6 will probably not be widely used for a loooong time, secondly, > people will probably still use evil firewalls if not NATs, especially on > shared/public connections, thirdly fast mobile connections are billed per gig > and slow ones are throttled so severely as to be unusable for us, and this is > likely to remain true for some time IMHO. >
"with time"... But I don't suppose there will be need for double NATs, or even NATs at all? I was of the belief that much security will be moved to the OS with IPv6 and enough addresses for every single device out there to get its own. We will probably see even more support for UPnP too? - Zero3
