* Zero3 <zero3 at zerosplayground.dk> [2008-11-26 20:51:14]: > Florent Daigni?re skrev: >>> I'd argue for a default autorun status of "off" though, and instead >>> make "on" the default on the relevant wizard page, along with a short >>> description of advantages/consequences of autorun'ing Freenet. >>> >> >> Here you are just being silly... but let's address that on the other >> thread: >> http://archives.freenetproject.org/message/20081126.001810.5c2fe629.en.html >> > > Silly? I disagree. Giving the user the choice to decide over how his own > system runs doesn't seem silly to me at all. Not automatically > autorunning without the user's accept to do so seems like the proper way > (even though much software goes against that practice).
The aim was to reduce the number of questions we ask during the installation to a minimum: on the basis that advanced users can change the settings they need afterwards, including whether the node auto-starts or not. > Informing about > the performance consequences really is in place too, even if it causes > some user to disable the autorun. Or not? "parse error" -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20081126/4dc4be72/attachment.pgp>
