On Wednesday 26 November 2008 19:35, Zero3 wrote: > Florent Daigni?re skrev: > > * Zero3 <zero3 at zerosplayground.dk> [2008-11-25 23:55:20]: > > > > > >> Shouldn't we just accept that fact that people are moving towards > >> mobility, and that most likely won't change anytime soon? :). > >> > >> > > > > I would really appreciate if you could share your insight on the topic: > > How exactly would you design a fully decentralized protocol where most > > of the nodes are hardly ever connected and mostly unreachable? > > > I'm not saying I have the magical answers, I'm just pointing out that > denying that the world is changing the way it is won't create any > solutions. With my basic knowledge of this stuff, I'm thinking: "less > uptime means people need more peers". I got the impression that the > peering of nodes is far from as trivial and automated as it could be. > > Perhaps a solution could be integration of external WoT's into Freenet. > I'm not familiar with how WoT works for social platforms like Facebook, > but I imagine you could create some kind of plugin to transfer (trusted) > friends from social platforms into Freenet nodes' darknet peer lists > (yes, I am aware of the privacy and security concerns and the challenges > involved - I'm just brainstorming a possible solution.).
This has been suggested several times. I think vive may have tried to get one of his students working on it. > > - Zero3 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 827 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20081126/a253d521/attachment.pgp>
