On Wednesday 29 April 2009 20:15:43 xor wrote: > On Wednesday 29 April 2009 20:52:03 Ian Clarke wrote: > > Are we sure having separate projects for "staging" and "official" in > > github is the right way to organize this? I don't see any other > > projects on github organized in this way. Shouldn't they be separate > > branches or something, not entire separate projects? > > > > Ian. > > Mmh yes it is annoying to keep separate projects I guess: For example the > build.xml must be corrected for each project: > > - Fred-staging/Fred-official need different build files.
They do? Why? > - WoT / Freetalk rely on Fred so the project name on which they are dependent > will not fit depending on whether you have checked out staging or official of > Fred. Why is this a problem? Just rename the directory! (Or on a sensible operating system use a directory symlink). -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090429/e28b76db/attachment.pgp>
