On Wednesday 29 April 2009 21:36:53 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 April 2009 20:15:43 xor wrote:
> > On Wednesday 29 April 2009 20:52:03 Ian Clarke wrote:
> > > Are we sure having separate projects for "staging" and "official" in
> > > github is the right way to organize this? I don't see any other
> > > projects on github organized in this way. Shouldn't they be separate
> > > branches or something, not entire separate projects?
> > >
> > > Ian.
> >
> > Mmh yes it is annoying to keep separate projects I guess: For example the
> > build.xml must be corrected for each project:
> >
> > - Fred-staging/Fred-official need different build files.
>
> They do? Why?
The ant builder ("New builder") has a configured build file of:
"${workspace_loc:/fred-staging/build.xml}"
OR
"${workspace_loc:/fred-official/build.xml}"
>
> > - WoT / Freetalk rely on Fred so the project name on which they are
>
> dependent
>
> > will not fit depending on whether you have checked out staging or
> > official
>
> of
>
> > Fred.
>
> Why is this a problem? Just rename the directory! (Or on a sensible
> operating system use a directory symlink).
I did so, yes. Not really a problem you just have to be smart enough to do so.
And the last time I renamed the directory it screwed egit up. The safest way
is to rename before checking out. Or to reconfigure the project dependancies of
Freetalk / WoT.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090429/f95c6377/attachment.pgp>
