On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote: > On Wednesday 29 April 2009 19:52:03 Ian Clarke wrote: >> Are we sure having separate projects for "staging" and "official" in >> github is the right way to organize this? ?I don't see any other >> projects on github organized in this way. ?Shouldn't they be separate >> branches or something, not entire separate projects? > > Security. Anyone with write access (i.e. just about anyone who asks for > access, whether we trust them or not) can clobber the whole tree or rewrite > history with a forced (non-fast-forward) update.
Are you sure there is no way to limit access on a per-branch basis? Have you asked on #github or #git on freenode? This seems inelegant. Ian. -- Ian Clarke CEO, Uprizer Labs Email: ian at uprizer.com Ph: +1 512 422 3588 Fax: +1 512 276 6674
