Am Montag 04 Mai 2009 17:33:30 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > 5. Use port 80,443,53,1863 for communication. (74 votes) > > I have no idea how this got into the top 5! Any ideas? People trying to run > nodes at work perhaps?
Maybe not wanting the provider to be able to just shut down nonstandard ports and block freenet that way. ISPs can block freenet ports, but shouldn't really block 80 - at least for outgoing connections. Maybe running it on a server. Best wishes, Arne --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- - singing a part of the history of free software - http://infinite-hands.draketo.de -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090504/b908e4ad/attachment.pgp>