On Wednesday, 13. May 2009 19:00:54 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> We could pause most of the node relatively easily, there will still be some
> background activity, and therefore some garbage collection, but it can be
> kept minimal...
That would be great.
As long as it doesn't access its memory very often, my system will put most of
it to swap, so this should also free most of the memory.
> > But I don't want to have that all the time. When I compile something in
> > the background, I want freenet to take predecence (that's already well
> > covered with the low scheduling priority, though).
>
> How would Freenet tell the difference?
When I click "pause" I want it to reduce its activity (ideally there'd be
"take a break for X hours" instead of "pause now and stay paused", because
else I'm prone to forget that I paused it.
Best wishes,
Arne
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
- singing a part of the history of free software -
http://infinite-hands.draketo.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090513/d9f342c2/attachment.pgp>
