Matthew Toseland schrieb: > 1. Release the 20 nodes barrier (206 votes) > > As I have mentioned IMHO this is a straightforward plea for more performance. > > 2. One GUI for all. (155 votes) > > This is usability, particularly bundling more functionality. VIVE LA Freetalk! > > 3. Add a 'pause' feature. (131 votes) > > Remarkably high ranking, I wonder what proportion of our users use online > games? > > 4. Implement reinsert on demand. (79 votes) > > This is IMHO about data persistence. > > 5. Use port 80,443,53,1863 for communication. (74 votes) > > I have no idea how this got into the top 5! Any ideas? People trying to run > nodes at work perhaps?
The last one may be because of censorship fearing. I have heard at least 1 report about an ISP blocking almost all UDP traffic, allowing only port 53. The user was forced to use port 53(udp) to be able to use freenet. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 315 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090504/67b6ea2c/attachment.pgp>
