On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Evan Daniel <evanbd at gmail.com> wrote:
> You know, you could have brought this up when we were discussing > moving the wiki. No I couldn't, because at the time I didn't know that their wiki hosting was so badly designed because I hadn't personally tried it. > Or you could suggest an alternative Mediawiki host; > I could, except I'm not familiar with Mediawiki nor the hosting options for it - I took people's word for it that it would be an improvement on what we have now. > you shouldn't have much trouble moving the wiki, since SF provides > convenient backups / exports. I don't think anyone is particularly > committed to SF, we were just tired of standing around bitching > instead of actually working on it. If you want to wait around for the > perfect solution to the wiki hosting problem to appear, don't let > those of us working on writing stuff for it get in your way. > Can't we discuss the fact that the proposed new wiki appears to be unusable, without you getting mad at me? Its not my fault that SF's usability sucks. > You don't particularly sound like you want help solving this problem, > but I might as well ask: did you actually succeed at logging in to the > SF site? I'm not really concerned about myself, I'm more concerned about that fact that the new wiki appears unviewable (since I assume I'm not the only person having problems with it). As it stands, an unviewable wiki is far worse than what we already have at wiki.freenetproject.org. Tell me I'm wrong, but don't get mad at me simply for making an observation. Ian. -- Ian Clarke CEO, SenseArray Email: ian at sensearray.com Ph: +1 512 422 3588 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20100104/61ae7d0e/attachment.html>
