-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 12/03/2011 02:26 AM, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 29. November 2011, 22:47:47 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
>>> - I think that trust system of FMS is better than WoT. You have the
>>> opportunity to divide trust to person and his opinion to other persons
>>> (I
>>> think it's really important to divide this things). And what changes are
>>> planned in WoT?
>>
>> FMS is better than WoT because FMS works. Whereas Freetalk+WoT is undergoing
>> significant changes and is rather heavy on disk access at present.
>>
>> And yes, per-domain trust is planned; talk to xor, but this is pretty long
>> term. I'm not convinced myself though, it's pretty hard to define domains
>> (somebody may post good messages and bad files, or they may post good
>> messages on one board and spam on another...)
>
> I think what he meant is trusting someone but not trusting the trustlist. And
> I also think, that that would be useful. But I don?t tink that we need it on
> the short term, because you can always just set the trust to 0 to see the
> users messages but not use his/her trustlist.
>
> Best wishes,
> Arne
But wouldn't that drive down the trust calculations of those who trust you?
- Volodya
- --
http://freedom.libsyn.com/ Echo of Freedom, Radical Podcast
"None of us are free until all of us are free." ~ Mihail Bakunin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJO2cLrAAoJENW9VI+wmYas6doIAK2pxVTo07ie01P5zEsTKsRj
vyZXvs6Gg7jgVn24wO5PqquU1P6OC6LBXBArNCw7ZX/slFiaY7/kBszrjd/ypMrR
yzXOaWVBwu2/i1hDfwgVHrUDQGxa79y72bwQpBrM+ga2AInmkKYjoCYVNwLlg8xC
pZHIuXBaZpzih+8rAJSqekOwZ3XFK4ZMC2YYuPqkRY+79xpLYc0OhKB1BR2+NF4B
ie+AfjUIW3AXKV8KfZg5OqsuZDvrT0tpox7D1ds70nA2tckBo48SoZ4oUKFkefRC
RwHBWtvkt91fK+LizKA+XgnS66KurN60F8SypBDVCA/7bzGoOa/OGbT4OAoXCDM=
=+5lM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
