Am Dienstag, 29. November 2011, 22:47:47 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > > - I think that trust system of FMS is better than WoT. You have the > > opportunity to divide trust to person and his opinion to other persons > > (I > > think it's really important to divide this things). And what changes are > > planned in WoT? > > FMS is better than WoT because FMS works. Whereas Freetalk+WoT is undergoing > significant changes and is rather heavy on disk access at present. > > And yes, per-domain trust is planned; talk to xor, but this is pretty long > term. I'm not convinced myself though, it's pretty hard to define domains > (somebody may post good messages and bad files, or they may post good > messages on one board and spam on another...)
I think what he meant is trusting someone but not trusting the trustlist. And I also think, that that would be useful. But I don?t tink that we need it on the short term, because you can always just set the trust to 0 to see the users messages but not use his/her trustlist. Best wishes, Arne -- 1w6 sie zu achten, sie alle zu finden, in Spiele zu leiten und sacht zu verbinden. ? http://1w6.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 316 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20111202/1b40c731/attachment.pgp>
