On Sunday 02 Jan 2011 11:22:09 artur wrote: > Hi, > > sorry for bumping an old topic, but I would like to know if there were > any conclusions on moving to Java 1.6? > If I followed the thread correctly, there were some problems with Mac OS > X users. But Apple is working with Oracle now, to support Open JDK for > Mac OS x. > > http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2010/11/12openjdk.html > > artur
It would be a good idea to move to Java 6. Does OS/X (at least the common, maintained versions) have good Java 6 support as of this moment? > > > > Am 28.10.2010 14:21, schrieb Matthew Toseland: > > It would simplify the build process and enable us to use new language > > features if we moved to Java 1.6. The problem is: > > 1) Mac OS/X 10.4 only has Java 5. As I understand it you have to pay for > > upgrades, and they are disruptive, so most people don't? > > 2) It would slightly increase the difficulty of getting Freenet working on > > free JVMs. > > > > Is it worth doing it anyway? How many people run OS/X 10.4 nowadays? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20110215/16f3a647/attachment.pgp>
