On Wednesday 16 Feb 2011 04:07:00 Daxter wrote: > On Feb 15, 2011, at 9:34 PM, Ian Clarke wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Matthew Toseland <toad at > > amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote: > > Does OS/X (at least the common, maintained versions) have good Java 6 > > support as of this moment? > > > > Yes, we should do it. > > The most recent version of OS X is 10.6, which ships with Java 6 preinstalled. > > 10.5 (which older machines can run) ships with Java 5, but can be upgraded to > Java 6. The problem is that even though the standard software updates install > Java 6, it isn't used by default. Here's a guide for users to change that: > http://gephi.org/users/install-java-6-mac-os-x-leopard/ > > Would users running the updated version of Freenet on 10.5 actually need to > change the default version of Java running, or will Freenet automatically > choose the right one?
Okay, so there is a problem. Is it sufficient simply to document the fact that we need Java 1.6 on the download page? (Which most users won't see) IzPack or JWS should tell the user... -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20110216/98749c35/attachment.pgp>
