On Monday 11 Jul 2011 18:25:05 Steve Dougherty wrote:
> Do I understand correctly that this problem is specific to Firefox? If we
> can tell which browser the launcher will use, there could be a special case
> for Firefox where the launcher opens a page asking for permission to switch
> to private browsing mode, (I wouldn't expect this to be intelligent enough
> to detect if private browsing was already active)  pointing out that it will
> close any non-private tabs. If they say no, it would make sense to me to ask
> them to use privacy mode on another browser or finish using non-private tabs
> in Firefox first.

Yes, it's a firefox specific problem. Asking the user anything is nontrivial 
though. It's a bit easier at install time.
> 
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Matthew Toseland <toad at 
> amphibian.dyndns.org
> > wrote:
> 
> > On Monday 11 Jul 2011 17:23:53 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > > On Monday 11 Jul 2011 15:45:00 Ian Clarke wrote:
> > > > Can we detect if Firefox is already running, and if it is - ask the
> > user's
> > > > permission before relaunching it in Private Browsing mode?
> > >
> > > Perhaps (I suspect it would take most of a day to implement this given
> > we're using AHK); but what if they say no? And that's just for Windows ...
> > On unix/mac we'd probably be able to do something but we can only count on
> > having ps...
> >
> > Oh and did I mention it's a major pain to do a GUI yes/no dialog on
> > unix/mac, portably in a way that always works? We don't have a system tray
> > applet on unix but we do have start menu shortcuts, including Browse
> > Freenet... On the other hand on Windows we'd probably need to enumerate all
> > processes, which probably means some hackery involving the windows api,
> > assuming AHK doesn't provide something.
> >
> > But it doesn't solve the basic problem: IT SHOULD JUST WORK!
> >
> > If the problem doesn't arise with Chrome then that might be a feasible
> > solution at least on Windows (and presumably Mac)...
> > > >
> > > > Ian.
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Matthew Toseland <
> > toad at amphibian.dyndns.org
> > > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Ideas?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > > > > From: Mantis Bug Tracker <mantis at osprey.vm.bytemark.co.uk>
> > > > > To: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org
> > > > > Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 01:56:07 +0100
> > > > > Subject: [Freenet 0005209]: Freenet forces firefox into private
> > browsing
> > > > > mode
> > > > >
> > > > > The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
> > > > >
> > ======================================================================
> > > > > https://bugs.freenetproject.org/view.php?id=5209
> > > > >
> > ======================================================================
> > > > > Reported By:                somebody
> > > > > Assigned To:                toad
> > > > >
> > ======================================================================
> > > > > Project:                    Freenet
> > > > > Issue ID:                   5209
> > > > > Category:                   website
> > > > > Reproducibility:            always
> > > > > Severity:                   major
> > > > > Priority:                   urgent
> > > > > Status:                     assigned
> > > > >
> > ======================================================================
> > > > > Date Submitted:             2011-07-11 01:56 BST
> > > > > Last Modified:              2011-07-11 01:56 BST
> > > > >
> > ======================================================================
> > > > > Summary:                    Freenet forces firefox into private
> > browsing
> > > > > mode
> > > > > Description:
> > > > > I installed freenet and it opened a private browsing window. Doing
> > this
> > > > > closed
> > > > > all of my existing windows without warning, breaking downloads in
> > progress
> > > > > and
> > > > > loosing all of my tabs (which sadly contained some important data
> > which is
> > > > > now
> > > > > destroyed forever).
> > > > >
> > > > > For my uses, this forced private browsing mode horribly breaks
> > things. I DO
> > > > > NOT
> > > > > WANT PRIVATE BROWSING.
> > > > >
> > > > > I spent about an hour going through every single advanced
> > configuration
> > > > > option
> > > > > and I can not find any possible way to turn this functionality off.
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't even need it to open a browser window, I can do that myself
> > if I
> > > > > have
> > > > > to, but double clicking the icon always opens a browser window and
> > destroys
> > > > > whatever I already have open.
> > > > >
> > > > > Not having any options to control this is a poor design choice.
> > > > >
> > ======================================================================
> > > > >
> > > > > Issue History
> > > > > Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change
> > > > >
> > ======================================================================
> > > > > 2011-07-11 01:56 somebody       New Issue
> > > > > 2011-07-11 01:56 somebody       Status                   new =>
> > assigned
> > > > > 2011-07-11 01:56 somebody       Assigned To               => toad
> > > > >
> > ======================================================================
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Devl mailing list
> > > > > Devl at freenetproject.org
> > > > > http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Ian Clarke
> > > > Personal blog: http://blog.locut.us/
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Devl mailing list
> > Devl at freenetproject.org
> > http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
> >
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20110712/3128936a/attachment.pgp>

Reply via email to