On Tuesday 07 Aug 2012 15:42:12 Fabio Gonzalez wrote: > For me it is important information that conveys the button rather than the > visual. It says download, but the button on the site not only allows > download, as also load the installer, no matter of what the button, I think > this should be specified.
This is fairly normal for anything you install from the web? "Install" might be better than "Download" I guess? > > Of all the forms I do not think a good idea to exchange a more informative > button for a less informative button. > > I read an article GNUnet site I may have misunderstood: > A node can be said to have a fake number and use it to make several nodes > meet a very small part of the request, it can affect the network, this > problem has been fixed? Not a problem for Freenet. Freenet divides a file into many small chunks called blocks/CHKs, and fetches them from all over the network. > > If not, I believe that using Darknet can fix the problem. Darknet can fix many problems yes. The main problem is it needs to be easy to use, and we need to have enough people for it to be viable. > > For the uniform distribution is not necessary a good random? (Not to > mention public > key) > Because Freenet does not ask the person to move the mouse, or write > something on the keyboard? Randomness is a problem yes. You see that when freenet starts up and tells you that it's still trying to find enough entropy/randomness, and starts accessing the hard disk randomly to try to do that. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20120812/861eb59e/attachment.pgp>