`searchLeaderEpoch` is different from field name `leaderEpoch` in the schema. In general it is probably preferred to be consistent. If we feel that searchLeaderEpoch is more intuitive and readable than leaderEpoch, would it make sense to just use this name in the schema in KIP-320?
[ Full content available at: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/5564 ] This message was relayed via gitbox.apache.org for [email protected]
