On Jan 21, 2010, at 5:36 PM, Ecaterina Valica wrote: > This is not generic - this depends on the containers. We have plenty of > working rules with 100%.
ok then I guess it means they should be commented. How will we remember the reason otherwise? (open question) Thanks -Vincent > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 17:54, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On Jan 21, 2010, at 4:50 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: >> >>> On 01/21/2010 04:32 PM, Vincent Massol wrote: >>>> First commit! Yeah :) Champagne! >>>> >>>> Some questions below (hey I couldn't left the first commit go without >> questions ;)) >>>> >>>> On Jan 21, 2010, at 4:24 PM, evalica (SVN) wrote: >>>> >>>>> Author: evalica >>>>> Date: 2010-01-21 16:24:22 +0100 (Thu, 21 Jan 2010) >>>>> New Revision: 26284 >>>>> >>>>> Modified: >>>>> platform/skins/trunk/colibri/src/main/resources/colibri/colibri.css >>>>> Log: >>>>> XSCOLIBRI-180: Scroll and width problems on Stats space >>>>> >>>>> Modified: >> platform/skins/trunk/colibri/src/main/resources/colibri/colibri.css >>>>> =================================================================== >>>>> --- platform/skins/trunk/colibri/src/main/resources/colibri/colibri.css >> 2010-01-21 14:52:45 UTC (rev 26283) >>>>> +++ platform/skins/trunk/colibri/src/main/resources/colibri/colibri.css >> 2010-01-21 15:24:22 UTC (rev 26284) >>>>> @@ -1316,7 +1316,7 @@ >>>>> } >>>>> >>>>> div.panellayoutcontainer-2col .panellayoutcol { >>>>> - width: 50%; >>>>> + width: 49%; >>>> >>>> Where does this magic number come from? Is the 1% important? If so maybe >> this warrants some comment? >>> >>> There are rounding errors in IE, sometimes 50% + 50% = 101% >> >> ok thanks. My question was more: shouldn't we comment it? >> >> Or is it more generic and in this case should it be decided as a general >> rule and put on dev.xwiki.org in the best practices section? >> >> Thanks >> -Vincent _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
