Marius Dumitru Florea wrote: > Hi devs, > > Right now JavaScript extensions are included when a document is rendered > in WYSIWYG edit mode. This has both advantages and disadvantages. > > Pro: If the output of a macro depends on a JavaScript extension, then > the result of rendering that macro will be the same in view mode and > (WYSIWYG) edit mode. > > Con: If the JavaScript extension is not aware of the edit mode then it > can modify the DOM document outside of the read-only macro markers which > leads to unwanted changes in the content of the edited document (i.e. > the modifications done by the JavaScript extension are saved). Such an > example is http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-4665 . > > WDYT? Should we limit the WYSIWYG in order to make the editing safer?
I'm +1 to remove JSX inclusion in WYSIWYG edit mode. I've never seen the value of executing the extensions in the WYSIWYG. Making the extensions be responsible for their behavior inside the WYSIWYG frame sounds like unneeded pain. Jerome. > > I'm +0. > > Thanks, > Marius > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
