Marius Dumitru Florea wrote: > Marius Dumitru Florea wrote: >> Hi devs, >> >> Right now JavaScript extensions are included when a document is rendered >> in WYSIWYG edit mode. This has both advantages and disadvantages. >> >> Pro: If the output of a macro depends on a JavaScript extension, then >> the result of rendering that macro will be the same in view mode and >> (WYSIWYG) edit mode. >> >> Con: If the JavaScript extension is not aware of the edit mode then it >> can modify the DOM document outside of the read-only macro markers which >> leads to unwanted changes in the content of the edited document (i.e. >> the modifications done by the JavaScript extension are saved). Such an >> example is http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-4665 . >> >> WDYT? Should we limit the WYSIWYG in order to make the editing safer? > > FYI, I get a JavaScript exception ("XWiki is not defined") if I edit > Main.AllDocs when javascript.vm template is not imported in WYSIWYG > editing mode. Should the live table macro check if the XWiki JavaScript > object is present?
Yes It should. Thanks for catching this. Jerome. > > Thanks, > Marius > >> I'm +0. >> >> Thanks, >> Marius >> _______________________________________________ >> devs mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
