Marius Dumitru Florea wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> Right now JavaScript extensions are included when a document is rendered
> in WYSIWYG edit mode. This has both advantages and disadvantages.
>
> Pro: If the output of a macro depends on a JavaScript extension, then
> the result of rendering that macro will be the same in view mode and
> (WYSIWYG) edit mode.
>
> Con: If the JavaScript extension is not aware of the edit mode then it
> can modify the DOM document outside of the read-only macro markers which
> leads to unwanted changes in the content of the edited document (i.e.
> the modifications done by the JavaScript extension are saved). Such an
> example is http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-4665 .
>
> WDYT? Should we limit the WYSIWYG in order to make the editing safer?
FYI, I get a JavaScript exception ("XWiki is not defined") if I edit
Main.AllDocs when javascript.vm template is not imported in WYSIWYG
editing mode. Should the live table macro check if the XWiki JavaScript
object is present?
Thanks,
Marius
>
> I'm +0.
>
> Thanks,
> Marius
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
