On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea < [email protected]> wrote:
> Hi devs, > > Right now JavaScript extensions are included when a document is rendered > in WYSIWYG edit mode. This has both advantages and disadvantages. > > Pro: If the output of a macro depends on a JavaScript extension, then > the result of rendering that macro will be the same in view mode and > (WYSIWYG) edit mode. > > Con: If the JavaScript extension is not aware of the edit mode then it > can modify the DOM document outside of the read-only macro markers which > leads to unwanted changes in the content of the edited document (i.e. > the modifications done by the JavaScript extension are saved). Such an > example is http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-4665 . > Would XSKINX-14 (Let extensions declare a list of web actions (view, edit, etc.) it should be pulled for) fix at least some of the issues? > WDYT? Should we limit the WYSIWYG in order to make the editing safer? > > > I'm +0. > > Thanks, > Marius > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
